[whatwg] Comments on the <video> element

Le Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:44:08 +0200, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis  
<bhawkeslewis at googlemail.com> a ?crit:

> Intriguing. My uneducated guess would be that YouTube would prefer to
> stick to Flash, since it's probably harder to strip branding out of
> Flash than any XML format.

I don't believe the current <video> definition is compelling enough for  
video sites to use the new feature. I have stated some of the reasons in  
my initial email.



-- 
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future

Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 04:11:04 UTC