W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] Thoughts on the <hi> element (formerly the <m> element).

From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:49:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20070221174942026849.64be93b5@empyree.org>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:51:46 +1100, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>> | <blockquote>
>> |   XForms is a W3C recommendation.
>> |   <hi by="Matthew Raymond" title="This comment has no logical basis.">
>> |   XForms Tiny is does not conflict with XForms, but WF2 does.</hi>
>> | </blockquote>
> 
> Interesting.  The concept of specifying who added a particular mark 
> using the |by| attribute could be useful for collaborative 
> editing/reviewing.

I like it too. Maybe some kind of machine-readable ID (like 
"user-45023" or byid="45023") could have some use, once again for 
collaborative editing, the same way as datetime use a machine-readable 
format (yyyy-mm-dd). I don't know much on this topic and Friendly name 
should be favoured if they suffice.
-- 
</david_latapie>             U+0F00
http://blog.empyree.org/en (English)
http://blog.empyree.org/fr (Fran?ais)
http://blog.empyree.org/sl (Slovensko)
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 08:49:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC