W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] Thoughts on the <hi> element (formerly the <m> element).

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:46:12 +0100
Message-ID: <op.tnxuracn64w2qv@id-c0020>
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:05:03 +0100, Matthew Raymond  
<mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I've been pondering a use for the <m> element, and I agree that the
> highlighting sematics make the name "hi" a better choice. Also, I think
> it would be most useful in this context:

FWIW, I think <hi> is a very confusing name. I keep thinking of some  
header until I read it's supposed to replace the <m> element. If this  
element is needed <m> is definitely a better name.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 01:46:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC