W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] Thoughts on the <hi> element (formerly the <m> element).

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:33:30 +0000
Message-ID: <1171816410.766.4.camel@galahad>
Matthew Raymond wrote:
> I've been pondering a use for the <m> element, and I agree that the
> highlighting sematics make the name "hi" a better choice. Also, I think
> it would be most useful in this context:
> 
> | <blockquote>
> |   XForms is a W3C recommendation.
> |   <hi by="Matthew Raymond" title="This comment has no logical basis.">
> |   XForms Tiny is does not conflict with XForms, but WF2 does.</hi>
> | </blockquote>

Whatever the merits of <hi> over <ins>, putting complex notes intended
for human consumption into attributes like "title" that cannot contain
hypermedia references or semantic or linguistic information seems
guaranteed to break.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 08:33:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC