W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > February 2007

[whatwg] Web Apps 1.0 Editorial: IDL Bindings

From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:27:54 -0500
Message-ID: <45C65DEA.8050700@metalab.unc.edu>
For a few years I spent a lot of time teaching DOM to mixed audiences: 
i.e. Java. JavaScript, C++ and other language programmers in the same 
room. Initially I described a lot of examples in IDL to try not to 
offend anybody. Instead, as it happened, I annoyed everyone equally.

I rapidly learned that almost nobody was actually comfortable reading 
IDL. Showing the Java bindings with some hand waving and an example or 
two of how this mapped to C++ and JavaScript satisfied everyone a lot 
more than IDL. I soon dropped all the IDL material from my notes. No one 
missed it.

I understand  why DOM and now Web Apps 1.0 needed to be *defined* in 
terms of IDL, but I suspect it would be very helpful if there were 
normative (or perhaps non-normative) appendices that showed the bindings 
to at least Java, and possibly other languages as well. This would be 
much easier for most programmers to read and understand.

I don't yet see any placeholder in the spec for this. My apologies if I 
missed it; but I do think this would be a very useful addition for 
pedagogical reasons if nothing else.

For myself, I am working on some Web Apps 1.0 notes at the moment, and 
am translating the IDL into Java by hand just to make it a little 
clearer to my audience.

-- 
?Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo at metalab.unc.edu
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2007 14:27:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:32 UTC