W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > August 2006

[whatwg] Dynamic content accessibility in HTML today

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:48:06 -0700
Message-ID: <op.td90mgssaw9dld@id-c0020.globalsuite.net>
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:36:40 -0700, James Graham <jg307 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> But XBL works with ~0 assistive technologies and is presumably going to  
> be complex to implement properly. Whilst, in general, I agree that  
> having elements used in the correct way to provide semantic information  
> is desirable, I think that adopting a technology that is already  
> implemented and proven to solve real problems is a better approach than  
> waiting on a complex future specification to be finished and implemented.

So a while ago I posted  
http://annevankesteren.nl/2006/06/accessibility-ideas some of my thoughts  
regarding role=""... Basically, I don't really see authors taking extra  
steps to make things accessible. Accessibility should just be an integral  
part of the language, otherwise I don't think it will work. For authors it  
will seem that without role="" their custom widgets will work so there's  
no real benefit in adding it unless you work for some big company that  
hires a few "accessibility experts" who tell you to add it.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 06:48:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:28 UTC