- From: Olav Junker Kjær <olav@olav.dk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:39:54 +0200
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Validators should not be > non-conformant simply because they only do their job to validate a > document and nothing else. I don't see any reason why such a statement > needs to be included at all. I like the requirement! The intention is (I assume) to prevent validators to claim "this document is valid HTML5" while the document might very well be invalid according to the spec. The problem is that validators use the term "valid" in a very limited sense, but web authors without a through understanding of DTD-validation would naturally assume that "valid" would mean "valid according to the spec". regards Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 04:39:54 UTC