W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2005

[whatwg] [html5] tags, elements and generated DOM

From: Olav Junker Kjær <olav@olav.dk>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:02:06 +0200
Message-ID: <4253C1AE.7050407@olav.dk>
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> see no problem with defining error handling for broken 
> documents, but no need to break conformance with SGML in the process. 
> HTML is an application of SGML, regardless of all the broken 
> implementations and documents we currently have, and I don't want to see 
> that changed.

An innocent question (no flamewar intended): What is the benefit of 
having HTML defined as an application of SGML ?

regards
Olav Junker Kj?r
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 04:02:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:22 UTC