W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2004

[whatwg] [web-apps] Some comments

From: Jim Ley <jim.ley@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 13:34:44 +0000
Message-ID: <851c8d3104111205347f937877@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jim Ley wrote:
> > Which is the exact same situation as with javascript calculator.  It's
> > completely semantically empty unless you do it in the markup too.
> > javascript is just as optional as CSS if correctly used, an example of
> > an incorrect use of either does not disqualify that point.
> 
> What gives you the idea that JS is optional?

Implementation experience, specification experience, accessibility
experience, there are plenty of sites on the web that rely on JS, but
equally there are plenty that rely on CSS.

Jim.
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 05:34:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 13 April 2015 23:08:20 UTC