Re: [webvr] Chrome WebVR avaliable only on secure origins

On Jul 13, 2016 6:04 AM, "Martin Splitt" <mr.avgp@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> We welcome feedback, especially if this policy makes your planned use
case infeasible!
> >
> > TLS makes all kinds of things infeasible.
>
> Can you give a example?

For one thing, your own file system is not considered a secure origin. I've
ran into lots of people trying to get into WebVR that just don't understand
what that means. They see a page, they see they can link to images on that
page, they can double click on that file and see the results. It never
occurs to then that they need to run a local web server. If they don't
already know what that means, it's nearly impossible to explain the
indirection. Why do they need a web server when the file is right there?

I know several more people who have no idea how to setup a self-signed
certificate on their machine to be able to test features on their own
networks. OpenSSL is not that easy to install on Windows. A similar fiat
decision was made for WebRTC. I eventually just copied the certs off of my
production site and live with the cert warnings. S terrible solution to a
stupid problem.

Frankly, I've been a web dev for 20 years and it feels rather ridiculous
that web dev is harder, more cumbersome *today*. I don't even get why
disabling XmlHTTPRequest was necessary, rather than restricting it to the
parent directory of the page.

I agree with Florian. It's on Google to provide tools, not dictate how they
are used.

Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 10:31:01 UTC