- From: Nils Ohlmeier <nohlmeier@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:12:21 -0800
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: public-webrtc@w3.org
In case we are counting by the amount of people (which your message bellow suggest): I’m against adoption. Nils Ohlmeier > On 29Nov, 2018, at 04:35, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > When tallying the arguments and positions for or against adoption, I was > unable to determine clearly the position of the following people who > have participated in the thread: > > - Youenn Fablet > - Cullen Jennings > - Sergio Garcia Murillo > - Lennart Grahl > - Alexey Aylarov > - Roman Shpout > > I could make guesses based on commentary, but that would be guesswork; > it would be better if the people themselves were to say "Favors > adoption", "Against adoption", or "Does not wish to be counted". > > I also note that in Lyon there were ~10 people supporting adoption; so > far I've tallied 9 people supporting adoption on the list; if the > remaining supporters wish to be part of the tally, they'd better speak > up now. (I think both of the people not supporting adoption in Lyon have > spoken up.) > > Harald > > > Den 20.11.2018 09:57, skrev Harald Alvestrand: >> ** >> >> *From the Lyon summary of decisions:* >> >> * >> >> "The WG will ask the list if we should adopt the WEBRTC-QUIC API >> document (in room: 2 opposed, ~10 in favor)" >> >> The question is whether we should adopt this document: >> >> **https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-quic/ >> >> as a Working Group document >> >> Adoption as a WG document does not mean commitment to any specific part >> of the API, or any specific timeline for processing the document to CR >> and beyond, but does mean that we can issue the document as a first >> public working draft (FPWD) and ask for IPR declarations (if any). >> >> >> My personal read is that adoption as a WG document means that "we have >> consensus that there is a problem here that needs solving, the problem >> is within the scope of this WG, and this document is a start on the way >> to solving it". >> >> Non-adoption would indicate either that the problem shouldn't be solved, >> that the problem is out of scope for this WG, or that this document is >> so far away from the right solution that it's not a starting point the >> WG wants to consider. >> >> >> We are seeking both statements of support and statements of opposition. >> The chairs will tally the responses and attempt to draw a conclusion. >> >> Please state your opinion to the**list on or before Wednesday, November 28. >> >> Harald*,* for the chairs >> >> * >> > >
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2018 18:12:47 UTC