- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:10:57 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2015-09-14 06:53, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > On 11/09/2015 21:01, Martin Thomson wrote: >> ...since Dom asked, yes we would have to retain this in current >> implementations, but we might only retain the prefixed versions. > > I'm afraid they aren't prefixed in Chrome; shouldn't we add the > constructor to the dictionary, even if only for backwards comapt? If we don't, we're breaking pretty much every single app out there. /Adam
Received on Monday, 14 September 2015 07:11:27 UTC