- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 06:51:30 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 11/09/2015 21:01, Martin Thomson wrote: > ...since Dom asked, yes we would have to retain this in current > implementations, but we might only retain the prefixed versions. I'm afraid they aren't prefixed in Chrome; shouldn't we add the constructor to the dictionary, even if only for backwards comapt? Dom
Received on Monday, 14 September 2015 04:51:37 UTC