Re: Summary of replace track status from Martin Thomson on 2015-05-29 (public-webrtc@w3.org from May 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 09:17:17 -0700
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXU3pF4Lo-6+BkBzcjeoScv7S7RH1jw9NRLCPYageJsfg@mail.gmail.com>

On 29 May 2015 at 05:55, Stefan Håkansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> I think you are right, and it also seems (based on feedback from others)
> that replaceTrack should work even if a renegotiation is required.

That's not what I got from Cullen's comment.  His point was that
replacing should work from any state.  Your statement here leads me to
infer that replaceTrack can cause renegotiation.  That's what
addTrack/removeTrack are for.

Received on Friday, 29 May 2015 16:17:44 UTC