- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:44:54 +0000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
- CC: public-webrtc <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 07/02/15 01:25, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 6 February 2015 at 10:43, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> wrote: >>> The intention with waiting for the queue to drain is that there might be >>> operations queued that, when completed, makes negotiation unnecessary. >>> For example, a setLocalDescription that updated the localDescirption to >>> match the added tracks. >> >> This seems like it might be difficult to implement. > > I don't believe that we could implement this in Firefox. OK. Let's take a first stab at this without involving the operations queue. /Adam
Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 13:45:24 UTC