- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 09:55:24 -0700
- To: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2 May 2014 06:18, Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that implicit cloning is bad. However it might be worthwhile to > remember why anyone ever thought it was a good idea, just so we don't miss > anything. Was it to avoid the assigment of conflicting constraints/settings > to the track in the different PCs (i.e. pre-doHickey)? The idea, as I recall, was that you would be able to do some "extra" things with the clone that is attached to the PC. That originally included mainly status variables, stats, etc..., but it was also envisaged that it include the things we are doing with RTCRtpSender/Receiver.
Received on Friday, 2 May 2014 16:55:51 UTC