Re: W3C has a new process, should we adopt it? from Martin Thomson on 2014-12-03 (public-webrtc@w3.org from December 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:23:21 -0800
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXGtkPtv=VdkprXRq_kx_CwhPyN4GtX3obA7n7BvVgq7w@mail.gmail.com>

On 3 December 2014 at 07:56, Stefan Håkansson LK
<stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> We think the new process is an improvement; its main drawback is
> that W3C as a community has less experience with it (obviously).

Having a Last Call state on a document has always seemed artificial.
I would assume that you would still intend to have a last call of some
sort, but have that a "soft state", rather than something informal.
Would you care to articulate what you intend to do to solicit "wide"
review for documents?

Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 16:23:48 UTC