- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:16:28 -0800
- To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 2013-11-15 10:59, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > I know this may make me > sound like an antediluvian, [...] I think that Adam addressed all your concerns adequately. I'll point out that addStream would still exist and have the same behaviour. Like Adam, the idea that a Doohickey has a life of its own is not interesting to me. > receiver gets some knowledge of existing streams on the sender > side, but has no way to know if he got all the tracks for each stream That's an interesting point, but it's dependent on the sender disassembling streams in the first place. I'm going to have to assume that the sender knows what they are doing in that case. It's analogous to creating a new MediaStream with the subset of tracks and sending that today.
Received on Friday, 15 November 2013 17:16:55 UTC