- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:31:17 +0000
- To: cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>
- CC: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
I think this will end up having privacy implications. For example, there was a bunch of discussion about the JS not being able to know if the user had selected a file or camera. Why would the JS need to know the difference between these two ? On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:16 AM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a follow-up discussion to https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=257104 > > The WebRTC specification needs to provide a better error message in case the browser denies access to the camera, instead of the user. Currently, the specification states that > PERMISSION_DENIED is > the result of the user denying access. Instead of simply > modifying the definition of > PERMISSION_DENIED > to cover both cases, I propose splitting it into separate cases: > > > > > > PERMISSION_DENIED_BY_USER > > > > PERMISSION_DENIED_BY_BROWSER > > > > > > > > Alternatively, > we need to add a String error message alongside the enum, and > require browsers to issue a different error message for each > case. > > > > > > Thank > you, > > Gili
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 03:31:45 UTC