Re: On babies and bathwater (was Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface) from Peter Thatcher on 2013-07-20 (public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:56:45 -0700
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>, "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUFX0nrUtQ4TFF+v2r2fbCUxQxDGmYzRHpYTBxOCeRao7Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > It's interesting that most or your list of things that needed to be
> solved without SDP (simulcast, FEC, correlation of RTP streams with
> MediaStreamTracks, glare) still haven't been solved for WebRTC even with
> SDP, despite many months (years?) of effort.
> >
>
> Peter, with the exception of Simulcast, which of these do you think has
> not been solved in SDP when not using bundle?
>
>
>
Has FEC been defined for WebRTC?
Has glare been solved?
Has mapping of RTP streams with MediaStreamTracks been resolved (with the
exception of the "unity plan" which has not yet been approved)?

I think the whole list I gave is still unsolved/unresolved.

Received on Saturday, 20 July 2013 00:57:52 UTC