W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Stats v2 proposal - for Thursday's meeting

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:26:41 +0100
Message-ID: <50C7C131.8080006@alvestrand.no>
To: public-webrtc@w3.org
On 12/11/2012 11:01 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 11 December 2012 13:38, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> On 12/11/2012 07:34 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>> On 11 December 2012 07:48, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>>>> that's impossible to implement due to some WebKit limitations
>>> Would it make a difference if you made the substitution:
>>> s/dictionary/[NoInterfaceObject] interface/g ?
>> Not much of a difference; if I can tell the difference aright, I also have
>> to do s/^/attribute/, or s/$/()/ (making all the members either attributes
>> or functions).
> I think that perhaps I wasn't clear enough - if webkit is unable to
> produce dictionaries (I'm surprised by this, btw), then is it equally
> unable to produce interfaces?
Each new interface class requires the addition of approx. 3 files to 
Webkit (IDL, .h and .cc) (at minimum), and causes the generation of half 
a dozen more, resulting in a significant number of added code bytes.
If the type should be carried all the way through WebKit to the 
underlying browser, it usually takes about 6 more files to accomplish that.

It's an uncomfortable meeting place between a strongly typed language 
and a proto-typed one.
>
> The rest of us are not similarly afflicted by this limitation.  I
> would expect the specification to use dictionaries throughout.
>
Good for you. WebKit's open source, so you're free to contribute a solution.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 23:27:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 December 2012 23:27:13 GMT