- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:01:26 -0800
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Cc: "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On 11 December 2012 13:38, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: > On 12/11/2012 07:34 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> >> On 11 December 2012 07:48, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote: >>> >>> that's impossible to implement due to some WebKit limitations >> Would it make a difference if you made the substitution: >> s/dictionary/[NoInterfaceObject] interface/g ? > > Not much of a difference; if I can tell the difference aright, I also have > to do s/^/attribute/, or s/$/()/ (making all the members either attributes > or functions). I think that perhaps I wasn't clear enough - if webkit is unable to produce dictionaries (I'm surprised by this, btw), then is it equally unable to produce interfaces? The rest of us are not similarly afflicted by this limitation. I would expect the specification to use dictionaries throughout.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 22:01:57 UTC