- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:55:24 +0300
- To: Julee Burdekin <julee@adobe.com>
- Cc: Pearl Chen <pearlchen@google.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_J2n8FQCEimmAk2mD-ePSAz7g90-9CqKi8KGeJCGypL=A@mail.gmail.com>
I think Pearl refers to situations such as (for example) "Since this is a block element can only contains inline element, such as <span>" and not necessarily code examples with syntax highlighting. ☆*PhistucK* On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Julee Burdekin <julee@adobe.com> wrote: > Hi, Pearl: > > Thinking you’re talking about referring to content inline, and not > providing an example. You might want to review the guide on how to update > existing content[1] — there’s a syntax highlighting section. Also, refer to > the gotchas page for additional quirks of the system.[2] > > HTH > > J > [1] > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Editors_Guide/step_5_update_existing_content > [2] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Style_Guide/Gotchas > ------------------- > Julee Burdekin > Content Strategist > Adobe Web Platform > @adobejulee > julee@adobe.com > > From: Pearl Chen <pearlchen@google.com> > Date: Thursday, July 17, 2014 at 10:38 AM > To: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> > Subject: Formatting of html tags > Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thursday, July 17, 2014 at 10:39 AM > > I'm trying to figure out of there is a preferred way to display html > tags in text. I've seen it in various formats within the WPD docs, with and > without brackets, with and without bold: > > - html element > - *html* element > - <html> element > - *<html>* element > > My gut tells me to use "<html>", no bold unless there's an actual > emphasis needed. > > Pearl >
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 17:56:31 UTC