W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > September 2013

Re: We Need a Meeting!

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:08:58 +0100
Message-ID: <523C10AA.4090903@w3.org>
To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
CC: Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Thanks, Scott. I raised an issue (enhancement #16).

RI


On 19/09/2013 18:12, Scott Rowe wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> To create an issue, log at project.webplatform.org
> <http://project.webplatform.org>, visit the Content project page
> (http://project.webplatform.org/content), and click the Report an Issue
> button.
>
> ~SCott
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org
> <mailto:renoir@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hello Richard
>
>     Sorry for the no followup and thanks for participating with us.
>
>     I also think it might be out of friday's meeting scope.
>
>     But as Scott said, adding an issue in our issue tracker won't do
>     harm. I would also suggest you link the appropriate messages thread
>     from the list archive.
>
>     One other thing is that we heavily rely on IRC too. You can join
>     #webplatform-site on freenode.
>
>     Regards
>
>
>     Renoir Boulanger | Developer operations engineer
>     W3C | webplatform.org <http://webplatform.org>
>
>     http://w3.org/people/#renoirbhttps://renoirboulanger.com ✪ @renoirb
>     ~
>
>
>     Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com <mailto:scottrowe@google.com>> wrote:
>
>     Well, I think the agenda is quite full, and I'm concerned that this
>     issue is somewhat beyond the scope of the discussion. The immediate
>     purpose of the meeting is to gain a sense of where the project
>     currently stands and to raise any issues that may impede progress.
>
>     For Richard's issue, I think the best way to approach this is by
>     first filing an issue in our tracker.
>
>     Richard, please create a new content issue here:
>
>     http://project.webplatform.org/content/planning
>
>     Add the issue under Unassigned issues.
>
>     We can certainly put this on the agenda for discussion, but we may
>     not get to it tomorrow.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>     ~Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Eliot Graff
>     <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Richard.
>
>         Apologies for missing your original mail. Yes, this is the
>         correct list and this is the correct meeting to start the
>         discussion. We do have a small team of people to implement
>         changes to templates, but we should discuss this in the overall
>         content discussion before implementing.
>
>         Scott, can you add this item to the agenda? I know we're really
>         packed for tomorrow; if we can't get to it this week, we can
>         either discuss further in mail or take it up at the next meeting.
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Eliot
>
>
>
>
>          >-----Original Message-----
>          >From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org <mailto:ishida@w3.org>]
>          >Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:54 AM
>          >To: public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>
>          >Subject: Re: We Need a Meeting!
>          >
>          >I'm new to this list, so I don't know your procedures. Ten
>         days ago, I sent the
>          >following email, which attracted no response. Would it be a
>         suitable topic for
>          >discussion at your meeting?
>          >
>          >RI
>          >
>          >On 09/09/2013 14:36, Richard Ishida wrote:> Folks,  >  > I've
>         been working
>          >through the list of HTML elements and attributes  > putting in
>         links to the i18n
>          >resources we have, and have made a start on  > the CSS
>         properties, etc. It
>          >wasn't always obvious where to put those  > links - they are
>         not really like the
>          >other optional links that appear at  > the bottom of the page;
>          >internationalization information is typically an  > essential
>         part of the
>          >information that content authors/developers need  > (as, of
>         course, is WAI
>          >info).
>          > >
>          > > I'd like to propose that the template for each page in the
>         list of  > elements,
>          >attributes, and properties, etc. include an additional  >
>         section: Universal
>          >Access.
>          > >
>          > > In this section we can add WAI, i18n and device
>         independence tips, and  >
>          >links to relevant materials.
>          > >
>          > > Is this the right list to make such suggestions? Who would
>         take  > decisions
>          >on that?
>          > >
>          > > Cheers,
>          > > RI
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 20 September 2013 09:09:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:54 UTC