- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:14:26 +0100
- To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- CC: Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Sorry, make that enhancement #20 under Information Architecture. (I couldn't see a category 'unassigned issues'.) RI On 20/09/2013 10:08, Richard Ishida wrote: > Thanks, Scott. I raised an issue (enhancement #16). > > RI > > > On 19/09/2013 18:12, Scott Rowe wrote: >> Hi Richard, >> >> To create an issue, log at project.webplatform.org >> <http://project.webplatform.org>, visit the Content project page >> (http://project.webplatform.org/content), and click the Report an Issue >> button. >> >> ~SCott >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org >> <mailto:renoir@w3.org>> wrote: >> >> Hello Richard >> >> Sorry for the no followup and thanks for participating with us. >> >> I also think it might be out of friday's meeting scope. >> >> But as Scott said, adding an issue in our issue tracker won't do >> harm. I would also suggest you link the appropriate messages thread >> from the list archive. >> >> One other thing is that we heavily rely on IRC too. You can join >> #webplatform-site on freenode. >> >> Regards >> >> >> Renoir Boulanger | Developer operations engineer >> W3C | webplatform.org <http://webplatform.org> >> >> http://w3.org/people/#renoirb ✪ https://renoirboulanger.com ✪ >> @renoirb >> ~ >> >> >> Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com <mailto:scottrowe@google.com>> >> wrote: >> >> Well, I think the agenda is quite full, and I'm concerned that this >> issue is somewhat beyond the scope of the discussion. The immediate >> purpose of the meeting is to gain a sense of where the project >> currently stands and to raise any issues that may impede progress. >> >> For Richard's issue, I think the best way to approach this is by >> first filing an issue in our tracker. >> >> Richard, please create a new content issue here: >> >> http://project.webplatform.org/content/planning >> >> Add the issue under Unassigned issues. >> >> We can certainly put this on the agenda for discussion, but we may >> not get to it tomorrow. >> >> Thanks! >> >> ~Scott >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Eliot Graff >> <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Richard. >> >> Apologies for missing your original mail. Yes, this is the >> correct list and this is the correct meeting to start the >> discussion. We do have a small team of people to implement >> changes to templates, but we should discuss this in the overall >> content discussion before implementing. >> >> Scott, can you add this item to the agenda? I know we're really >> packed for tomorrow; if we can't get to it this week, we can >> either discuss further in mail or take it up at the next meeting. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Eliot >> >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org >> <mailto:ishida@w3.org>] >> >Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:54 AM >> >To: public-webplatform@w3.org >> <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org> >> >Subject: Re: We Need a Meeting! >> > >> >I'm new to this list, so I don't know your procedures. Ten >> days ago, I sent the >> >following email, which attracted no response. Would it be a >> suitable topic for >> >discussion at your meeting? >> > >> >RI >> > >> >On 09/09/2013 14:36, Richard Ishida wrote:> Folks, > > I've >> been working >> >through the list of HTML elements and attributes > putting in >> links to the i18n >> >resources we have, and have made a start on > the CSS >> properties, etc. It >> >wasn't always obvious where to put those > links - they are >> not really like the >> >other optional links that appear at > the bottom of the page; >> >internationalization information is typically an > essential >> part of the >> >information that content authors/developers need > (as, of >> course, is WAI >> >info). >> > > >> > > I'd like to propose that the template for each page in the >> list of > elements, >> >attributes, and properties, etc. include an additional > >> section: Universal >> >Access. >> > > >> > > In this section we can add WAI, i18n and device >> independence tips, and > >> >links to relevant materials. >> > > >> > > Is this the right list to make such suggestions? Who would >> take > decisions >> >on that? >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > RI >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 20 September 2013 09:15:01 UTC