W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > September 2013

Re: We Need a Meeting!

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:14:26 +0100
Message-ID: <523C11F2.9010302@w3.org>
To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
CC: Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Sorry, make that enhancement #20 under Information Architecture. (I 
couldn't see a category 'unassigned issues'.)

RI


On 20/09/2013 10:08, Richard Ishida wrote:
> Thanks, Scott. I raised an issue (enhancement #16).
>
> RI
>
>
> On 19/09/2013 18:12, Scott Rowe wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> To create an issue, log at project.webplatform.org
>> <http://project.webplatform.org>, visit the Content project page
>> (http://project.webplatform.org/content), and click the Report an Issue
>> button.
>>
>> ~SCott
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org
>> <mailto:renoir@w3.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hello Richard
>>
>>     Sorry for the no followup and thanks for participating with us.
>>
>>     I also think it might be out of friday's meeting scope.
>>
>>     But as Scott said, adding an issue in our issue tracker won't do
>>     harm. I would also suggest you link the appropriate messages thread
>>     from the list archive.
>>
>>     One other thing is that we heavily rely on IRC too. You can join
>>     #webplatform-site on freenode.
>>
>>     Regards
>>
>>
>>     Renoir Boulanger | Developer operations engineer
>>     W3C | webplatform.org <http://webplatform.org>
>>
>>     http://w3.org/people/#renoirbhttps://renoirboulanger.com ✪
>> @renoirb
>>     ~
>>
>>
>>     Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com <mailto:scottrowe@google.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Well, I think the agenda is quite full, and I'm concerned that this
>>     issue is somewhat beyond the scope of the discussion. The immediate
>>     purpose of the meeting is to gain a sense of where the project
>>     currently stands and to raise any issues that may impede progress.
>>
>>     For Richard's issue, I think the best way to approach this is by
>>     first filing an issue in our tracker.
>>
>>     Richard, please create a new content issue here:
>>
>>     http://project.webplatform.org/content/planning
>>
>>     Add the issue under Unassigned issues.
>>
>>     We can certainly put this on the agenda for discussion, but we may
>>     not get to it tomorrow.
>>
>>     Thanks!
>>
>>     ~Scott
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Eliot Graff
>>     <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com <mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Richard.
>>
>>         Apologies for missing your original mail. Yes, this is the
>>         correct list and this is the correct meeting to start the
>>         discussion. We do have a small team of people to implement
>>         changes to templates, but we should discuss this in the overall
>>         content discussion before implementing.
>>
>>         Scott, can you add this item to the agenda? I know we're really
>>         packed for tomorrow; if we can't get to it this week, we can
>>         either discuss further in mail or take it up at the next meeting.
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>
>>         Eliot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>          >-----Original Message-----
>>          >From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org
>> <mailto:ishida@w3.org>]
>>          >Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:54 AM
>>          >To: public-webplatform@w3.org
>> <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>
>>          >Subject: Re: We Need a Meeting!
>>          >
>>          >I'm new to this list, so I don't know your procedures. Ten
>>         days ago, I sent the
>>          >following email, which attracted no response. Would it be a
>>         suitable topic for
>>          >discussion at your meeting?
>>          >
>>          >RI
>>          >
>>          >On 09/09/2013 14:36, Richard Ishida wrote:> Folks,  >  > I've
>>         been working
>>          >through the list of HTML elements and attributes  > putting in
>>         links to the i18n
>>          >resources we have, and have made a start on  > the CSS
>>         properties, etc. It
>>          >wasn't always obvious where to put those  > links - they are
>>         not really like the
>>          >other optional links that appear at  > the bottom of the page;
>>          >internationalization information is typically an  > essential
>>         part of the
>>          >information that content authors/developers need  > (as, of
>>         course, is WAI
>>          >info).
>>          > >
>>          > > I'd like to propose that the template for each page in the
>>         list of  > elements,
>>          >attributes, and properties, etc. include an additional  >
>>         section: Universal
>>          >Access.
>>          > >
>>          > > In this section we can add WAI, i18n and device
>>         independence tips, and  >
>>          >links to relevant materials.
>>          > >
>>          > > Is this the right list to make such suggestions? Who would
>>         take  > decisions
>>          >on that?
>>          > >
>>          > > Cheers,
>>          > > RI
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 20 September 2013 09:15:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:54 UTC