Re: Beta and Beyond

hi all,

I think that there is a typo under "Content items for later" where DOM
reference pages are cited - both here and under "Content Items."

My guess is that we won't have a complete DOM API reference, though meeting
all of the goals for content is not unrealistic, but we should at least set
the goal of having the pages organized in a coherent hierarchy delineated
in the URLs.

+Scott





On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, everyone:
>
> At today's community meeting we reviewed
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status and, barring any
> objections, we agreed to move ahead with it.
>
> Regards.
>
> Julee
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
> Organization: W3C
> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:36 PM
> To: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Subject: Beta and Beyond
> Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:37 PM
>
> >Hi, folks-
> >
> >Julee, Eliot, and I met on Friday to start to lock down our Beta
> >requirements and schedule. The gist (which should surprise nobody) is
> >that we will be making project for each "activity" in the project
> >management system (Bug Genie)
> >
> >Our Beta criteria will be focused on Infrastructure, Content, and
> >Community goals.
> >
> >We would like to establish a timeline for each project based on our
> >community discussion evaluation of the time needed, so please help
> >refine our rough notes here:
> >
> >http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Project_Status
> >
> >With a week or so, we hope to have several projects entered into
> >project.webplatform.org, and we'll use that as a starting point for
> >further refinements.
> >
> >Some criteria we want to meet may not be Beta... they may be later
> >goals. We should still list them and keep track of them.
> >
> >Regards-
> >-Doug
>
>
>