W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Editors Guide proposed outline (Bug #20160)

From: Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:08:42 +0000
Cc: <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9A2533FC-3419-4997-94D3-BC3BED4AAD53@w3.org>
To: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
Shoulda checked first - this already kind of exists at http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Editors_Guide - Garbee started to put this together a little while ago.

They take different approaches, and I think both have merits. I think both suffer from a potential risk of TL;DR, so ideally we need to:

1. Write a "5 minute guide to getting started"
2. List the more detailed guides to accomplishing specific tasks in a sensible structured way that allows people to get more help on topics they are working on, as and when they need it. This is not too terrible right now, but could do with tweaking.

So who is gonna take charge of doing this?

Chris Mills
Opera Software, dev.opera.com
W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)

On 7 Jan 2013, at 22:48, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, everyone:
> We've talked about streamlining the user experience for getting started contributing to WPD. To address this bug (https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20160), we created a draft Editor's Guide outline here:
> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Proposals/editors_guide
> Please comment and review either on the wiki page or in this email list.
> Thanks much.
> Julee
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 12:08:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:46 UTC