Re: Editors Guide proposed outline (Bug #20160)

Her proposal is a replacement for the current "guide". I didn't really have
time to work on it Julee was nice enough to take it over.

-Garbee

> On Jan 8, 2013 7:08 AM, "Chris Mills" <cmills@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> Shoulda checked first - this already kind of exists at
http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Editors_Guide - Garbee started to put
this together a little while ago.
>>
>> They take different approaches, and I think both have merits. I think
both suffer from a potential risk of TL;DR, so ideally we need to:
>>
>> 1. Write a "5 minute guide to getting started"
>> 2. List the more detailed guides to accomplishing specific tasks in a
sensible structured way that allows people to get more help on topics they
are working on, as and when they need it. This is not too terrible right
now, but could do with tweaking.
>>
>> So who is gonna take charge of doing this?
>>
>> Chris Mills
>> Opera Software, dev.opera.com
>> W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
>> Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)
>>
>> On 7 Jan 2013, at 22:48, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi, everyone:
>> >
>> > We've talked about streamlining the user experience for getting
started contributing to WPD. To address this bug (
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20160), we created a draft
Editor's Guide outline here:
>> >
>> > http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Proposals/editors_guide
>> >
>> > Please comment and review either on the wiki page or in this email
list.
>> >
>> > Thanks much.
>> >
>> > Julee
>> > ----------------------------
>> > julee@adobe.com
>> > @adobejulee
>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 15:46:34 UTC