W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Distributing bugs to share the workload?

From: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:51:43 -0800
To: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>, Julee <julee@adobe.com>
CC: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD105886.4C9C3%jburdeki@adobe.com>
Hi, Chris: A lot of the content bugs are assigned to you. Do you want to
run through those and share how you addressed them -- in terms of workload?

Julee
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee





-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2013 4:42 AM
To: julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
<public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Distributing bugs to share the workload?

>On 4 Jan 2013, at 16:43, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe bug owners could quickly go through the list of new bugs each
>>week and publish the ones they'd like people to "take"?
>> 
>> Would it help to have a regular triage meeting amongst the default bug
>>owners to quickly review and hand out bugs?
>> 
>> Other suggestions on getting the bugs moving so we could reduce the bug
>>count?
>
>Get project manager of some kind sorted ;-)
>
>Assign each project to a different person (Doug has most of them right
>now, I'm happy to keep the content project), and get that person in each
>case to be responsible for assigning bugs to others. You could just do a
>check for new bugs each week, so it wouldn't be that much work in the
>long run, after the already existing slew of bugs has been sorted out.
>
>I am not overjoyed about the idea of another regular meeting.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 18:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:37 UTC