W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Distributing bugs to share the workload?

From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:13:13 +0000
Cc: Julee <julee@adobe.com>, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-Id: <2F4D6530-3F80-4090-A664-8C09EAEB7015@opera.com>
To: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
I'm not 100% sure what you mean. they are assigned to me by default upon creation, then so I have dealt with, and many I haven't. Are you talking about the ones I have assigned time flags to, for example https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20373 ?

Chris Mills
Opera Software, dev.opera.com
W3C Fellow, web education and webplatform.org
Author of "Practical CSS3: Develop and Design" (http://goo.gl/AKf9M)

On 7 Jan 2013, at 18:51, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com> wrote:

> Hi, Chris: A lot of the content bugs are assigned to you. Do you want to
> run through those and share how you addressed them -- in terms of workload?
> 
> Julee
> ----------------------------
> julee@adobe.com
> @adobejulee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Mills <cmills@opera.com>
> Date: Monday, January 7, 2013 4:42 AM
> To: julee <julee@adobe.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
> <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Distributing bugs to share the workload?
> 
>> On 4 Jan 2013, at 16:43, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Maybe bug owners could quickly go through the list of new bugs each
>>> week and publish the ones they'd like people to "take"?
>>> 
>>> Would it help to have a regular triage meeting amongst the default bug
>>> owners to quickly review and hand out bugs?
>>> 
>>> Other suggestions on getting the bugs moving so we could reduce the bug
>>> count?
>> 
>> Get project manager of some kind sorted ;-)
>> 
>> Assign each project to a different person (Doug has most of them right
>> now, I'm happy to keep the content project), and get that person in each
>> case to be responsible for assigning bugs to others. You could just do a
>> check for new bugs each week, so it wouldn't be that much work in the
>> long run, after the already existing slew of bugs has been sorted out.
>> 
>> I am not overjoyed about the idea of another regular meeting.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 12:28:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:37 UTC