W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > December 2013

Re: VTT authoring guide on Web Platform Docs?

From: Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:19:51 -0800
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>
CC: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CEC68159.A3CCA%jburdeki@adobe.com>
Hi, everyone!

Yes, we have generally been documenting what is most widely used and
implemented. Sometimes, individuals have a favorite new, cool feature that
they also want to document. But when tackling a spec, we focus on the
most-implemented first.

The goal here is to help frontline designers and developers use the
technologies they need for projects they’re taking to production today.
And then inspire them for the future. This also means we want to use
real-life examples and simple explanations.

This is exciting!

HTH

Julee

----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee





-----Original Message-----
From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, December 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM
To: Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, WebPlatform Public List
<public-webplatform@w3.org>, "public-texttracks@w3.org"
<public-texttracks@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Subject: Re: VTT authoring guide on Web Platform Docs?
Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thursday, December 5, 2013 at 6:01 PM

>Great to hear your interest!
>
>I would indeed encourage to write about implemented reality, even
>though that will probably continue to improve over the next few
>months.
>
>You could explain the features as specified and then explain what
>works in the browsers now.
>
>This could, in fact, contribute to the testing efforts of the <track>
>element in HTML, see http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Testing .
>
>Cheers,
>Silvia.
>
>
>
>On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Carlos Araya <carlos.araya@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> I'd be interested in looking at working on something like this. However
>>the first question that comes to mind is whether we write to the way the
>>specification is written or to the way it is supported. As far as I know
>>there is no complete implementation of the VTT spec available,is there?
>>
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 12:43 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> it would be really cool to have an authoring guide for VTT (unlike the
>>>specification, which is essentially an implementation guide) on
>>>WebPlatformDocs.  There are some possible starting points, below,
>>>though of course to use any of this material we’d need to work with the
>>>authors and get permission.
>>>
>>> Is there someone who would like to pull this together and spearhead
>>>getting a good authoring guide on this important site?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 
>>>>http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/an-introduction-to-webvtt-and-track/

>>>> http://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/WebVTT

>>>> 
>>>>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2011/10/12/html5-video-captioning.as

>>>>px
>>>> http://www.delphiki.com/webvtt/

>>>> 
>>>>http://demosthenes.info/blog/580/Make-Online-Video-Accessible-And-Searc

>>>>hable-With-WebVTT
>>>> 
>>>>http://www.accessiq.org/news/features/2013/03/webvtt-and-captioning-on-

>>>>the-web
>>>
>>> David Singer
>>> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>>>
>>>
>

Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 03:20:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:56 UTC