- From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:29:18 -0700
- To: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPwaZpULOwkCmusDds+5CQ7LHY-YPC3GLbpFa9utjaKXnMKBEA@mail.gmail.com>
The image is in use as a generic example of an image that text floats around. There will likely be a lot of cases where a demo or example needs to show something off about working with an image. In those cases I don't think "relevancy" is necessary. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote: > Perhaps we owe it to our audience to keep images only if they are RELEVANT > as well as inoffensive, not obscene, etc. What's relevant about a cat with > a strip of bacon taped to it's ribs? Funny, maybe, but... > +Scott > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>wrote: > >> So, it sound so far like we should go with, "As long as it isn't >> obscene we can have a laugh." I'm down with that as long as others are. I >> just saw that and professionalism jumped into my head straight away >> compared to having fun. >> >> So at this point the main question would be, Does anyone simply outright >> object to non-professional style images? >> >> -Garbee >> >> >> On 10/31/2012 6:37 PM, Alex Komoroske wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Garbee <jonathan@garbee.me>wrote: >> >>> I somehow ended up checking recent uploads and found this little treat >>> [1]. While funny, I am wondering if we should have some terms for >>> acceptable media that is uploaded to the site? I think we should ask >>> images be more professional than this. >>> >> >> Whoa, at first glance I thought that was a cat with a recent surgical >> wound (gross!). Other than that concern about this particular image, >> however, pictures that are a bit irreverent don't personally bother me. >> >> On the one hand, we want to create a credible site >> that professionals can trust. On the other, WPD is part of the internet >> ecosystem--an ecosystem that has a certain kind of irreverent humor. I'm >> *personally *fine with images that are irreverent as long as they aren't >> over the top or potentially offensive. >> >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Garbee >>> >>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/File:box_baco.jpg >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 23:30:11 UTC