W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Public TelCon Tomorrow, November 6th at standard time

From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 16:08:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPwaZpU=0YpMkremDv=6eu_ZWGOzo7audmc0XpAG5Oj2E+1sjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: frozenice <frozenice@frozenice.de>
Cc: public-webplatform@w3.org
+1 to adding a note about it.

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:48 PM, frozenice <frozenice@frozenice.de> wrote:

> Ah, awesome. Guess I'll have to try it.
>
> Maybe we should add a note about that to WPD:Meetings (if there's nothing
> against promoting Skype).
>
>
> On 06.11.2012 21:24, Sιbastien Desbenoit wrote:
>
>> Skype works perfectly for me from France. You just have to add the +1
>> before the toll free number. No charge, everything is ok.
>>
>> Le 6 nov. 2012 ΰ 21:21, frozenice <frozenice@frozenice.de> a ιcrit :
>>
>>  Hmm, don't know about skype and international accounts / calls. Don't
>>> know about fees, never used it. :/
>>>
>>> Maybe someone who knows can chime in.
>>>
>>> On 06.11.2012 21:13, Jonathan Garbee wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can use Skype to call in and it should be toll free even using
>>>> that.  It is how I have been calling in the past two weeks.
>>>>
>>>> -Garbee
>>>>
>>>> On 11/6/2012 3:04 PM, frozenice wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Have there ever been thoughts about switching the TelCon to VoIP?
>>>>> Tuning in from Germany I have two issues: telephone fees and voice quality.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we would use something like Mumble [1] then international
>>>>> participants wouldn't need to worry about their telephone bill and would be
>>>>> able to understand people more clearly
>>>>> (anyone who tried Mumble has to love the voice quality there). I guess
>>>>> most people own a headset for Skype / Teamspeak / similar anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are also free iOS/Android apps for Mumble, so people can still
>>>>> join if they aren't near a computer (provided they have a compatible
>>>>> device).
>>>>>
>>>>> If any folks want to give Mumble a try, you can connect to
>>>>> frozenice.de port 33445 (no password needed, Server is in Germany).
>>>>> You might need to bring someone to talk to along ;)
>>>>> Else there's a server loopback test mode in your options.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mumble authentication (if someone wants to register) is based on
>>>>> certificates, you can also bring along your own valid cert you use for
>>>>> S/MIME for example, if not your client
>>>>> will generate a self-signed cert.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mumble could also be used at anytime, for spontaneous meetings and
>>>>> such, maybe even some people like to hang around.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just saying, I think it would be nice, but that's just my opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://mumble.sourceforge.net/ (yes, it's open-source!)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 06.11.2012 19:15, Alex Komoroske wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Great meeting today!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are the action items:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a reminder, *action items are expected to be completed by the next
>>>>>> meeting (Tuesday)*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ACTION: jkomoros to implement the above stuff about attributes
>>>>>> ACTION: Paul to talk to Alexis about CanIUse data license and use on
>>>>>> WPD.
>>>>>> ACTION: Paul to do further investigation into feasibility of markdown
>>>>>> tool
>>>>>> ACTION: Peter to write up formal debrief of Adobe doc sprint
>>>>>> ACTION: shepazu to write up a guide on how to do translations by hand
>>>>>> and send e-mails to the list
>>>>>> ACTION: shepazu to document how the translation workflow should work
>>>>>> and send to the list
>>>>>> ACTION: scottrowe to write up a proposal for flow-chart/organization
>>>>>> of architecture
>>>>>> ACTION: shepazu to lock it down so that only admins can move pages
>>>>>> ACTION: Julee to set up content architecture meetings for the next
>>>>>> few weeks
>>>>>> ACTION: Scott to add the upcoming WPD Google hackathon
>>>>>> ACTION: shepazu to approach Event Apart/John Alsup folks about doing
>>>>>> a WPD docsprint
>>>>>> ACTION: Alex to send out a doodle poll about a template-guru seminar
>>>>>> ACTION: Garbee to flesh out the todo proposal, including wireframes,
>>>>>> open questions, etc.
>>>>>> ACTION: Doug to make progress towards hosting skin on GitHub
>>>>>> ACTION: Shepazu to post a proposal to the list about the different
>>>>>> options for title
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And here are the full notes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jkomoros: scribe: jkomoros
>>>>>> [09:06am] jkomoros: Topic: Review last week's action items
>>>>>> [09:06am] jkomoros: ACTION: Janet to propose a page where people keep
>>>>>> track of what they're currently working on
>>>>>> [09:06am] HammHetfield joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:06am] jkomoros: jkomoros: Janet did do this
>>>>>> [09:06am] jkomoros: julee_: No response to the thread
>>>>>> [09:07am] paul_irish: http://docs.webplatform.org/**
>>>>>> wiki/WPD:Current_activity<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Current_activity>
>>>>>> [09:07am] chris9911 joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:07am] jkomoros: paul_irish: There's a straw man there with an
>>>>>> example. A few people chimed in on the thread, and that's as far as got.
>>>>>> [09:07am] jkomoros: ACTION: jkomoros to explain use of merge
>>>>>> candidate flag on the page.
>>>>>> [09:07am] jkomoros: jkomoros: done, on WPD:Flags/Merge_Candidate
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: ACTION: Garbee to write up proposal for tracking
>>>>>> of TODOs on site and send for comment.
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: Garbee: Done.
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: ACTION: jkomoros to implement the above stuff
>>>>>> about attributes
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: jkomoros: Not done. I will plan to tackle on
>>>>>> Friday
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: NEWACTION: jkomoros to implement the above stuff
>>>>>> about attributes
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: OLDACTION: Paul to talk to Alexis about CanIUse
>>>>>> data license and use on WPD.
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: paul_irish: Incomplete
>>>>>> [09:08am] jkomoros: NEWACTION: Paul to talk to Alexis about CanIUse
>>>>>> data license and use on WPD.
>>>>>> [09:09am] jkomoros: ACTION: Paul to re-open markdown syntax ticket
>>>>>> and restart discussion
>>>>>> [09:09am] jkomoros: paul_irish: Garbee reopened it and
>>>>>> discussion.Discussion tracked along the lines of, "awesome to do client
>>>>>> side, but we need to go in both directions."
>>>>>> [09:09am] David_Bradbury joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:09am] jkomoros: … We need to translate wikimarkup back into
>>>>>> markdown, and that part is hard to do. Needs more exploration
>>>>>> [09:09am] jkomoros: … I will do more exploration
>>>>>> [09:10am] jkomoros: ACTION: Paul to do further investigation into
>>>>>> feasibility of markdown tool
>>>>>> [09:10am] leaverou joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:10am] jkomoros: Topic: Docsprint Debrief
>>>>>> [09:10am] jkomoros: PeterLubbers: Great event. About 120 people
>>>>>> signed up. Only had space for about 50. we figured there would be a number
>>>>>> of no-shows.
>>>>>> [09:10am] jkomoros: … at the peak we had between 50 and 60 in the
>>>>>> room.
>>>>>> [09:11am] shepazu: (why markdown rather than wysiwyg?)
>>>>>> [09:11am] jkomoros: … We opened 34 new accounts. Maybe 60-70% of new
>>>>>> folks
>>>>>> [09:11am] Garbee: Markdown is what most seem to like to write in
>>>>>> more.  I'd guess due to GitHub.
>>>>>> [09:11am] jkomoros: … and a number of very experienced folks,
>>>>>> including some with MediaWiki experence
>>>>>> [09:11am] jkomoros: … HUGE thanks to Adobe. Really successful.
>>>>>> [09:11am] jkomoros: … they provided breakfast, lunch, dinner, drinks,
>>>>>> and the space.
>>>>>> [09:11am] Garbee: We actually need to discuss that more, since I
>>>>>> learned this week we can use some real HTML markup, so that would be the
>>>>>> preferred way to go I think.
>>>>>> [09:12am] jkomoros: … and nice shwag. T-shirts and some nice
>>>>>> notebooks.
>>>>>> [09:12am] jkomoros: … we have more t-shirts coming.
>>>>>> [09:12am] cgoodman joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:12am] jkomoros: … I'll do a more formal writeup
>>>>>> [09:12am] jkomoros: … I went through all of the history logs, we go
>>>>>> through over 800 committs!
>>>>>> [09:12am] jkomoros: ACTION: Peter to write up formal debrief of Adobe
>>>>>> doc sprint
>>>>>> [09:12am] jkomoros: … lead of Sencha spent all day working  on SVG
>>>>>> filter documentation
>>>>>> [09:13am] David_Bradbury: I'd avoid WYSIWYG if we can. We should
>>>>>> encourage clean markup here just as we would in our actual code
>>>>>> [09:13am] jkomoros: … we started at 9:30 and ended around 5, and
>>>>>> majority were there the whole day
>>>>>> [09:13am] jkomoros: … no major issues. No 503 errors, for examples.
>>>>>> [09:13am] Garbee: WYSIWYG is actually needed.  Since we want the
>>>>>> lowest barrier to entry possible.
>>>>>> [09:13am] jkomoros: … a number of developers wanted to be able to
>>>>>> send pull requests for CSS/site
>>>>>> [09:13am] jkomoros: … others wanted to make the developers more
>>>>>> interactive.
>>>>>> [09:14am] jkomoros: … last night one of them sent summary e-mail to
>>>>>> the group. Cool prototypes--everyone should check them out.
>>>>>> [09:14am] jkomoros: … for this hackathon, Scott Rowe created a doc
>>>>>> sprint tracking sheet. It worked pretty well. People could claim the areas
>>>>>> they were working on so they wouldn't
>>>>>> step on each other's toes
>>>>>> [09:15am] mike5w3c left the chat room. (Quit: mike5w3c)
>>>>>> [09:15am] jkomoros: … definitely having a tool LIKE this is important
>>>>>> for future docsprints
>>>>>> [09:15am] Garbee: http://bit.ly/YDdTU2  --Link to spreadsheet.
>>>>>> [09:16am] paul_irish: jkomoros: one of the guys there was an expert
>>>>>> in mediawiki bots. he wrote one that looked at recent new/moved pages and
>>>>>> flag ones that dont follow URL
>>>>>> guidelines we set. e.g. if the HTML was uppercase, it'd flag it. He
>>>>>> was gonna post to list but didn't just yet
>>>>>> [09:17am] jswisher joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:17am] jkomoros: PeterLubbers: Part of the point of these events
>>>>>> is the on boarding process to get new people involved.
>>>>>> [09:18am] mdel joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:18am] jkomoros: topic: Translations
>>>>>> [09:19am] jkomoros: jkomoros: At the docsprint, NotTomato found a lot
>>>>>> of pages that were translations and flagged them
>>>>>> [09:19am] jkomoros: shepazu: We wanted to have translations at
>>>>>> launch. But the mediawiki extensions weren't suitable. They had a bad
>>>>>> workflow and changed content around in original
>>>>>> article.
>>>>>> [09:20am] jkomoros: … The same people that helped us with comments
>>>>>> extension and others, we've been talking with them about doing a
>>>>>> translation extension. There are also folks from
>>>>>> Wikipedia who are interested.
>>>>>> [09:20am] jkomoros: … in the meantime we could simply allow people to
>>>>>> create translations using the convention we're going to follow
>>>>>> [09:20am] jkomoros: … so if someone would want to do a spanish
>>>>>> article, they could take the original article, add a "/es" to the end of
>>>>>> the URL and do a translation there.
>>>>>> [09:21am] jkomoros: … to keep them current, we need to have an
>>>>>> indicator on the main page about which translations are available, and on
>>>>>> the translated page how recently the main
>>>>>> page has been updated since this one has been page.
>>>>>> [09:21am] jkomoros: *edited
>>>>>> [09:21am] jkomoros: … and also a new UI.
>>>>>> [09:21am] jkomoros: … we hope to have it started very soon. This is a
>>>>>> common request.
>>>>>> [09:22am] chris9911 left the chat room. (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
>>>>>> [09:22am] jkomoros: ACTION: shepazu to write up a guide on how to do
>>>>>> translations by hand and send e-mails to the list
>>>>>> [09:22am] jkomoros: ACTION: shepazu to document how the translation
>>>>>> workflow should work and send to the list
>>>>>> [09:23am] jkomoros: eliot: What happens with moved English articles?
>>>>>> [09:23am] jkomoros: shepazu: Because they're all subpages, as long as
>>>>>> you check "move subpages", which should be default, then it should work
>>>>>> [09:25am] mstalfoort left the chat room. (Quit: kthxbai)
>>>>>> [09:25am] jkomoros: jkomoros: We need to make sure that people know
>>>>>> where to put articles
>>>>>> [09:25am] jkomoros: shepazu: What about a wizard
>>>>>> [09:25am] jkomoros: paul_irish: We could just have a bot flag these
>>>>>> so admins can figure out where they go
>>>>>> [09:26am] jkomoros: … I want the contributor to be able to contribute
>>>>>> very quickly. Don't want them to have to learn about entire IA.
>>>>>> [09:26am] jkomoros: … So I'd like a way for admins to be able to find
>>>>>> new articles and move them
>>>>>> [09:26am] jkomoros: scottrowe: I've looked into this. I've found our
>>>>>> current URL architecture is very confused.
>>>>>> [09:27am] jkomoros: … We haven't arrived at an agreement at how API
>>>>>> should be built out.
>>>>>> [09:27am] jkomoros: … I'm working on a proposal which I'll send out
>>>>>> today
>>>>>> [09:27am] jkomoros: *this week
>>>>>> [09:27am] jkomoros: ACTION: scottrowe to write up a proposal for
>>>>>> flow-chart/organization of architecture
>>>>>> [09:27am] mike5w3c joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:28am] fr0zenice: just checked, if someone did say that pages can
>>>>>> only be moved by admins, that's wrong [sry the quality isn't the best,
>>>>>> listening from germany :)]
>>>>>> [09:28am] jkomoros: ACTION: shepazu to lock it down so that only
>>>>>> admins can move pages
>>>>>> [09:29am] jkomoros: julee_: This is why I wanted a con tent
>>>>>> architecture meeting
>>>>>> [09:29am] jkomoros: … so maybe once scott sends that out we can meet
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> [09:29am] jkomoros: … if we are able to document what the
>>>>>> architecture IS, then we can reinforce it in the experience on the website,
>>>>>> which will help people understand it.
>>>>>> [09:29am] Garbee: fr0zenice, If it is wrong then we should address
>>>>>> the permissions.
>>>>>> [09:29am] jkomoros: … If we can have pages that are exemplary of a
>>>>>> given type to point people to
>>>>>> [09:30am] Garbee: They *should* be only movable my admins atm.
>>>>>> Regular users should flag.
>>>>>> [09:30am] fr0zenice: then we need to strip movefile / move /
>>>>>> move-subpages / move-rootuserpages from Users
>>>>>> [09:31am] jkomoros: ACTION: Julee to set up content architecture
>>>>>> meetings for the next few weeks
>>>>>> [09:32am] jkofoed joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:32am] jkomoros: Topic: Vibrant use of events calendar
>>>>>> [09:32am] jkomoros: eliot: Just wanted to make sure we get a calendar
>>>>>> going so we have more than two items on there.
>>>>>> [09:32am] shepazu: +1
>>>>>> [09:32am] jkomoros: … ideally we'd have a 3 month lead of
>>>>>> conferences, doc sprints, hackathons.
>>>>>> [09:32am] shepazu: q+
>>>>>> [09:32am] HammHetfield left the chat room. (Quit: HammHetfield)
>>>>>> [09:33am] jkomoros: … I think that's a resource we can make use of
>>>>>> [09:33am] jkomoros: jkomoros: Absolutely. Put things up as soon as
>>>>>> you know they may happen. Mark as tentative before the date is finalized.
>>>>>> [09:33am] jkomoros: ACTION: Scott to add the upcoming WPD Google
>>>>>> hackathon
>>>>>> [09:34am] jkomoros: shepazu: It occurs to me that we might want to
>>>>>> co-locate a docsprint with a conference
>>>>>> [09:35am] jkomoros: … or even emphasize conferences that are aligned
>>>>>> with WPD, or that give a free ticket to a WPD memeber.
>>>>>> [09:35am] jkomoros: eliot: Does anyone have a close contact at Event
>>>>>> Apart?
>>>>>> [09:35am] jkomoros: shepazu: We've talked to some of these folks,
>>>>>> they're enthusiastic
>>>>>> [09:35am] Salt joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:35am] jkomoros: ACTION: shepazu to approach Event Apart/John
>>>>>> Alsup folks about doing a WPD docsprint
>>>>>> [09:37am] desbenoit joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:38am] jkomoros: ACTION: Alex to send out a doodle poll about a
>>>>>> template-guru seminar
>>>>>> [09:39am] jkomoros: shepazu: Ryan suggested maybe Lua to look into
>>>>>> [09:39am] jkomoros: Topic: Tracking actions
>>>>>> [09:39am] jkomoros: Garbee: There have been a lot of complaints about
>>>>>> bug tracker being on separate domain and need a new account
>>>>>> [09:40am] jkomoros: … so we should ideally bring on the same domain
>>>>>> and ideally one with open ID/SSO with main site
>>>>>> [09:40am] jkomoros: … bug genie has the ability to track just about
>>>>>> anything we want to do with the project.
>>>>>> [09:40am] shepazu: q+
>>>>>> [09:42am] jkomoros: jkomoros: Want to make sure we're addressing all
>>>>>> use cases (e.g. savvy admin changes down to drive-by questions)
>>>>>> [09:42am] shaundunne joined the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:42am] jkomoros: Garbee: Ideally we'd have a comment system that's
>>>>>> plugged into bug system and automatically files a bug
>>>>>> [09:42am] shaundunne left the chat room.
>>>>>> [09:43am] jkomoros: scottrowe: Does that mean the comments from the
>>>>>> wiki could be funneled into buggenie
>>>>>> [09:43am] jkomoros: Garbee: Ideally, that's what I'd like. Since
>>>>>> BugGenie allows different fields.
>>>>>> [09:43am] jkomoros: shepazu: Does BugGenie have a write API.
>>>>>> [09:44am] jkomoros: Garbee: Not sure. I'll look into this if we'd
>>>>>> need to do custom work
>>>>>> [09:44am] fr0zenice: ref: http://issues.thebuggenie.com/**
>>>>>> wiki/Category%3ATheBugGenie%**3ADevelopment<http://issues.thebuggenie.com/wiki/Category%3ATheBugGenie%3ADevelopment>
>>>>>> [09:44am] jkomoros: jkomoros: This will require a technical expert to
>>>>>> be looped in, ideally Ryan
>>>>>> [09:44am] jkomoros: shepazu: I agree mostly with what's been said.
>>>>>> [09:45am] jkomoros: we do want to have people create accounts and
>>>>>> join the community. I do want to lower the barrier for bugs.
>>>>>> [09:45am] jkomoros: … the idea of having it somehow tie into comment
>>>>>> extension interests me.
>>>>>> [09:46am] jkomoros: shepazu: I think Ryan is supposed to be back not
>>>>>> next Tuesday but the one after that
>>>>>> [09:47am] jkomoros: ACTION: Garbee to flesh out the todo proposal,
>>>>>> including wireframes, open questions, etc.
>>>>>> [09:47am] jkomoros: scottrowe: I've noticed that sometimes I need to
>>>>>> save on the wiki twice.
>>>>>> [09:47am] Garbee: You may need to refresh the page by dropping the
>>>>>> cache.
>>>>>> [09:47am] Garbee: Edit tab > Refresh
>>>>>> [09:49am] jkomoros: jkomoros: I noticed an out-of-order problem in
>>>>>> the history this weekend
>>>>>> [09:49am] Garbee: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/**
>>>>>> Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19390<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19390>
>>>>>> [09:49am] jkomoros: Garbee: For session information, it's going to
>>>>>> require at least a mediawiki engine update.
>>>>>> [09:49am] shepazu: Garbee++
>>>>>> [09:50am] Garbee: I had to combine like 4 bugs into that one session
>>>>>> bug.
>>>>>> [09:50am] Garbee: They were just annoying to see everywhere.
>>>>>> [09:50am] jkomoros: jkomoros: Is there  way to make progress on
>>>>>> hosting the wiki on github?
>>>>>> [09:50am] jkomoros: shepazu: We could host skin on github in the
>>>>>> short term.
>>>>>> [09:50am] jkomoros: … this project is three or four different open
>>>>>> source projects, which all have their own contribution paths
>>>>>> [09:50am] jkomoros: … but there are a few things that we could put on
>>>>>> GitHub this week.
>>>>>> [09:51am] jkomoros: … I noticed there was a web platform on github.
>>>>>> Do we know who that is?
>>>>>> [09:51am] jkomoros: ACTION: Doug to make progress towards hosting
>>>>>> skin on GitHub
>>>>>> [09:51am] jkomoros: … we also want to host our extensions in a place
>>>>>> where people can contribute to them.
>>>>>> [09:52am] jkomoros: … and just to clarify, we're TOTALLY open to this
>>>>>> [09:52am] jkomoros: shepazu: One last thing
>>>>>> [09:52am] jkomoros: … some people had asked about changing the title
>>>>>> for the pages in the wiki for SEO
>>>>>> [09:53am] jkomoros: … I made an extension that does this, and it's
>>>>>> ready to deploy when it will be least disruptive.
>>>>>> [09:53am] jkomoros: … What I'm proposing as the title content is
>>>>>> basically "<page title> : <topic-title> : WPD"
>>>>>> [09:53am] jkomoros: "font-size : CSS : WPD"
>>>>>> [09:54am] jkomoros: benoit: There won't be Web Platform in the title
>>>>>> [09:54am] leaverou: q+
>>>>>> [09:55am] jkomoros: ACTION: Shepazu to post a proposal to the list
>>>>>> about the different options for title
>>>>>> [09:55am] leaverou: q-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com<mailto:
>>>>>> jburdeki@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Hi: I added an agenda item:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Content architecture meeting(s)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             J
>>>>>>             ----------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         julee@adobe.com <mailto:julee@adobe.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         @adobejulee
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     From: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@google.com <mailto:
>>>>>> komoroske@google.com>>
>>>>>>     Date: Monday, November 5, 2012 9:44 AM
>>>>>>     To: "public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:public-webplatform@w3.**
>>>>>> org <public-webplatform@w3.org>>" <public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:
>>>>>> public-webplatform@w3.**org <public-webplatform@w3.org>>>
>>>>>>     Subject: Public TelCon Tomorrow, November 6th at standard time
>>>>>>     Resent-From: <public-webplatform@w3.org <mailto:
>>>>>> public-webplatform@w3.**org <public-webplatform@w3.org>>>
>>>>>>     Resent-Date: Monday, November 5, 2012 9:45 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I wanted to give everyone a heads up that I'll be chairing the
>>>>>> weekly telcon tomorrow (11/6) at 16:00 UTC / 12:00 ET / 9:00 PT. You can
>>>>>> find tactical details about the meeting
>>>>>>     at http://docs.webplatform.org/__**wiki/WPD:Meetings<http://docs.webplatform.org/__wiki/WPD:Meetings><
>>>>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/**wiki/WPD:Meetings<http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Meetings>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Agenda:
>>>>>>     * Welcome
>>>>>>     * Review of last week's action items
>>>>>>     * Triage of new bugs
>>>>>>     * Discussion topics (we'll see how many we have time for):
>>>>>>        * Docsprint debrief
>>>>>>        * Translations (hopefully with the right people in the call
>>>>>> this time)
>>>>>>        * Tracking bugs/actions with BugGenie
>>>>>>        * A seminar about how we've wired up our intricate template
>>>>>> system
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Please feel free to suggest more agenda topics that you'd like to
>>>>>> discuss.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     As a reminder, these meetings are open to anyone, although we
>>>>>> especially value the participation of active community members.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     --Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 00:09:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:35 UTC