Hi, Séb- On 12/13/12 4:02 PM, Sébastien Desbenoit wrote: > Hi all, > > Here are some tries. IMHO, we need to be as figurative as possible in > order to the user to understand the title just with those icons, that's > why I think the logo of CSS, the {{{}} solutions and the html5 - css > icons are tricky to work with. The same issue applies to html that's why > I made an < > icon with the shield one, I'm not sure users link shield > and html, I don't. I think most developers link HTML with the HTML5 logo... maybe I'm wrong. What about a solid shield, with small white < > inside? Too busy? > I edit the DOM too, but DOM is more abstract, so we have me free space. > > DOM -> icons-DOM-2 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1288> Still too busy. Maybe rethink the whole thing, away from the tree iconography? or use a different nesting metaphor? Sorry to be unhelpful... I'll play with a couple ideas myself. > CSS v2 -> icon-CSS-2 <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1289> This CSS one works much better for me! Nice work. > HTML v2 -> icon-html2 > <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1290> > HTML v3 -> icon-html3 > <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=1291> See above. I'd be happy with the shield, myself. Regards- -DougReceived on Thursday, 13 December 2012 21:53:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:57:36 UTC