- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:05:37 -0500
- To: frozenice <frozenice@frozenice.de>
- CC: public-webplatform@w3.org
Hi, frozenice- On 12/5/12 1:52 PM, frozenice wrote: > Uhm, yeah: > > css/properties/border-radius?zh is the same page as > css/properties/border-radius, you just added a parameter. > (I'm assuming we want translations on their own page) We would need to add our own extension to take care of this. I think that's possible. > css/properties/border-radius/lang:zh is still in the default namespace. Ah, are namespaces only at the "root"? Pity. > Also there could be problems with wiki markup, don't know for sure, but > wouldn't risk it. > If we want people to be able to filter search results by language, that > one does not help. > > css/properties/border-radius/lang-zh seems ok from a technical > standpoint, but doesn't look pretty. :( Hard to maintain. > css/properties/border-radius/$zh just looks wrong to me as a programmer :> > > I don't know, maybe some other char? > css/properties/border-radius/.zh > css/properties/border-radius/~zh > css/properties/border-radius/!zh > css/properties/border-radius/-zh > css/properties/border-radius/'zh > css/properties/border-radius/_zh > css/properties/border-radius/:zh (looks the best to me, also shouldn't > clash with CSS stuff) All these are assumed to use the existing subpage hack, which honestly, I'd prefer to avoid, if possible. But I could live with them, if we can automate how they are created. Regards- -Doug > On 05.12.2012 17:25, Chris Mills wrote: >> >> >> On 5 Dec 2012, at 16:19, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, Chris- >>> >>> On 12/5/12 10:55 AM, Chris Mills wrote: >>>> >>>> On 5 Dec 2012, at 15:50, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, folks- >>>>> >>>>> Yes, good point, Phistuck. >>>>> >>>>> The lang: namespace idea is interesting. Namespaces have >>>>> implications for search, which may be a good thing... we want >>>>> someone to be able to search within their own language (or rather, >>>>> within any particular language). It is a bit long, though... >>>>> >>>>> Chris, why did you dismiss the query-string delimiter? For >>>>> technical MediaWiki reasons, or some other reason? >>>> >>>> Oh, I'm sorry - I didn't mean to dismiss ? - that was supposed to be >>>> part of the previous sentence. I was only dismissing # and @ >>> >>> LOL... I misread your message. I agree about # and @. >>> >>> Since we're on the topic... what about it? >>> >>> Chinese: docs/webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/border-radius?zh >>> >> >> That would work pretty well, afaics. Anyone got any ideas on why this >> wouldn't work? >> >
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 19:05:56 UTC