- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:53:59 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-webpayments@w3.org
On 2015-01-16 15:36, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 1/16/15 1:56 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> Since public keys have no issuer, > > Of course they have issuers. These issuers don't have to be members of > the existing CA network which has eternally inject inertia into what's > possible re., PKI and PKIX. > >> is the idea that the key repositories act >> as virtual CAs and HTTPS is used as a binding element? I mean: How is >> the >> trust model? > Decentralized and based on logic, assuming Linked Open Data and machine > comprehensible relation semantics as the basis. I think this explanation needs improvement or be "translated" for a world that doesn't have this understanding of how Linked Data addresses trust and liability issues. Anders
Received on Friday, 16 January 2015 14:54:34 UTC