- From: Andrew Miller <amiller@cs.ucf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:19:38 -0500
- To: Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com>
- Cc: opentransact@googlegroups.com, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Is there a "via" On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Pelle Braendgaard <pelle@stakeventures.com> wrote: > I've always argued it is more intuitive and follows other similar email > standards, which is why we use it in OpenTransact. > > I think the PaySwarm community expressed some openness to change to that at > some point. > > P > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I've been looking at the terms "to" and "from" wrt a transfer in >> webcredits / opentransact / payswarm and pingback ongologies >> >> Payswarm uses >> >> source >> destination >> >> Opentransact uses >> >> to >> from >> >> Pingback uses >> >> source >> target >> >> There's a slight complexity in that pingback has a "to" field to which is >> your pingback service. So there's possible collisions of named query >> variables a theoretical possibility. >> >> Of these 3 I think that "to" and "from" are the most intuitive, due to >> similarity to email / sms etc. >> >> I'm considering changing web credits to use these fields. >> >> Any thoughts? >> > > > > -- > http://picomoney.com - A whole new kind of money > http://payglo.be - Blog about payments from a global perspective > -- Andrew Miller
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:20:10 UTC