public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from January 2020 by author

Danyao Wang

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method Basic Card spec uses various Payment Request definition that Payment Request does not yet export (#890) (Wednesday, 15 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method Basic Card spec uses various Payment Request definition that Payment Request does not yet export (#890) (Tuesday, 14 January)

ianbjacobs

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Use Case: 3DS 1.0 flows and invoking PR API from inside an iFrame (#881) (Friday, 17 January)
• [w3c/payment-handler] Add informative mention of native payment handlers (#360) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] ISP managed "micropayments" as alternative to advertisement based funding for web content creators. (#893) (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] ISP managed "micropayments" as alternative to advertisement based funding for web content creators. (#893) (Sunday, 12 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] Updated link to PR API test suite (#892) (Tuesday, 7 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Tuesday, 7 January)

Janice Shiu

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Tuesday, 28 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Friday, 24 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] the user interface's language should not be derived from `the body element` (#895) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method Basic Card spec uses various Payment Request definition that Payment Request does not yet export (#890) (Tuesday, 14 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Monday, 6 January)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Payment request spec references the "Steps to check if a payment can be made" definition which is not exported to xref (#85) (Monday, 6 January)
• [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Payment Method Basic Card spec uses various Payment Request definition that Payment Request does not yet export (#890) (Friday, 3 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] Missing exported definition of payment request options (#890) (Friday, 3 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Dependencies section no longer needed (#83) (Friday, 3 January)

keenla

• [w3c/payment-request] ISP managed "micropayments" as alternative to advertisement based funding for web content creators. (#893) (Sunday, 12 January)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] the user interface's language should not be derived from `the body element` (#895) (Friday, 24 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] Remove recommendation to localize sheet based on body element (#896) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Allow locale to be specified by the developer. (#650) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] the user interface's language should not be derived from `the body element` (#895) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Friday, 24 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] the user interface's language should not be derived from `the body element` (#895) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] Dependencies section no longer needed (#83) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Export terms for payment method basic card spec (#894) (Thursday, 23 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Editorial: Update links to respec definitions (#891) (Wednesday, 22 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-method-basic-card] editorial: remove dependency section and update terms to use xref (#84) (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Updated link to PR API test suite (#892) (Tuesday, 21 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-request] Updated link to PR API test suite (#892) (Tuesday, 21 January)
• [w3c/payment-request] Missing definition of retrying a payment as a concept (#889) (Thursday, 2 January)

MaxG

• [w3c/payment-handler] PaymentRequestEvent.OpenWindow() could fail in two different ways (#361) (Friday, 31 January)

muzammilmuzamil

• [w3c/payment-handler] iDeal test payment- TRXID is not requested in my webpage's URL (#359) (Sunday, 12 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] How would iDeal work? (#251) (Sunday, 12 January)

Rouslan Solomakhin

• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] PaymentRequestEvent.OpenWindow() could fail in two different ways (#361) (Friday, 31 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] iDeal test payment- TRXID is not requested in my webpage's URL (#359) (Monday, 13 January)
• Re: [w3c/payment-handler] iDeal test payment- TRXID is not requested in my webpage's URL (#359) (Monday, 13 January)

Last message date: Friday, 31 January 2020 20:26:05 UTC