- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:54:23 +0200
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
On 2015-06-25 04:36, Joseph Potvin wrote: > RE: "Some participants strongly object to a W3C standard that is dependent upon an ISO standard." > > Is/are the reason(s) documented somewhere? I'd guess it's the issues > of the W3C's royalty-free licensing commitments versus ISO's RAND policy. > Plus I imagine there's objection to the relatively expensive fees that > ISO charges for access to its docs. IMO this discussion is rather the result of a somewhat fuzzy WPIG vision. If the backend speaks in a certain lingo, you obviously have to follow that. However, the front-end (wallet etc.) usually do not have the such constraints. Cheers, Anders
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 02:55:13 UTC