Re: Support for Verifiable Claims

I just checked Coralie's initial message. Chris is correct. My apologies.

On Thursday, 27 October 2016, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote:

> Actually, this is not a formal AC review of a proposed charter; it's a
> pre-view of said proposal, which as I understand it will be formally
> proposed to the AC sometime in November.
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Wood <david.wood@ephox.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.wood@ephox.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tantek,
>>
>> No, this is an AC review of a proposed working group charter in
>> compliance with the W3C Process, section 5.2.3.
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, 27 October 2016, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Out of curiosity, is this just a big cheerleading technology wishlist
>>> thread, or are y'all actively implementing verifiable claims
>>> prototypes and trying them on the open web?
>>>
>>> (I didn't see "implement", "prototype", or "incubate" mentioned in any
>>> of the chain of +1s previous in the thread, mostly just "contribute"
>>> which I suppose we are all doing by emailing about it, but we can do
>>> that within existing IGs/CGs.)
>>>
>>> I want a verified pony as much as the next person, but at some point
>>> the framing starts to look more like a solution looking for problems
>>> (or problems aspirationally assuming they'll be solved by a claimed
>>> foundational panacea) rather than something that actually benefits the
>>> web platform directly.
>>>
>>> E.g. perhaps pick one specific area that verifiable claims may
>>> potentially benefit that needs something like it badly (up to
>>> advocates to prototype/demonstrate workability to be sure), like
>>> WoT/IoT, which is currently beset by the wide deployment and
>>> misdirection[1] of quite a few "unverified" devices.
>>>
>>> (just did a quick web search on "verifiable claims" "web of things"
>>> and found a few pages that mention both, but nothing that actually
>>> connected these two in any substantive way. Hard to believe this email
>>> is the first suggestion thereof, earlier references welcome.)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Tantek Çelik
>>> AB member
>>> Web Standards Lead, Mozilla
>>>
>>> [1] I.e. I assume y'all have seen:
>>> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/10/hacked-cameras-dvrs-powe
>>> red-todays-massive-internet-outage/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Rinke Hoekstra <rinke.hoekstra@vu.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Dear All,
>>> >
>>> > The Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam also supports the Verifiable Claims
>>> WG Charter, and is looking forward to contributing.
>>> >
>>> > Best regards,
>>> >
>>> > Rinke Hoekstra
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On 21 Oct 2016, at 20:20, j.j.spaanderman@dnb.nl wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 to the Verifiable Claims WG charter on behalf of DNB.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >> Jurgen
>>> >>
>>> >> Van: Hakkinen, Mark T
>>> >> Verzonden: vrijdag 21 oktober 2016 20:08
>>> >> Aan: w3c-ac-forum@w3.org
>>> >> Cc: public-webpayments-comments@w3.org
>>> >> Onderwerp: RE: Support for Verifiable Claims
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 to the  verifiable claims working group charter
>>> http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/
>>> >>
>>> >> Educational Testing Service supports this charter and looks forward
>>> to contributing to the work of the group.
>>> >>
>>> >> Mark
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Markku (Mark) T. Hakkinen, PhD
>>> >> Managing Sr. Research Developer
>>> >> Accessibility, Standards, and Assistive Technology Research Group
>>> >> Center for Cognitive, Accessibility, and Technology Sciences
>>> >> Educational Testing Service
>>> >> Rosedale Road
>>> >> Princeton, New Jersey
>>> >> 08541 USA
>>> >> +1 609 734 5014 <(609)%20734-5014>
>>> >> mhakkinen@ets.org
>>> >> http://www.ets.org
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged
>>> or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for
>>> whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this
>>> e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy,
>>> distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this
>>> information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail
>>> is prohibited.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you for your compliance.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> De informatie verzonden met dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en
>>> uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u als niet-geadresseerde
>>> dit bericht ontvangt, wordt u verzocht direct de afzender hierover te
>>> informeren en het bericht te vernietigen. Gebruik van informatie door
>>> onbevoegden, openbaarmaking of vermenigvuldiging is verboden en kan leiden
>>> tot aansprakelijkheid.
>>> >>
>>> >> De afzender is niet aansprakelijk voor schade die verband houdt met
>>> risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. De e-mails
>>> en eventueel bijgevoegde bestanden zijn volgens een standaardprocedure
>>> gecontroleerd op computervirussen. Deze controle kan aanwezigheid van
>>> malware, zoals virussen, echter niet geheel uitsluiten.
>>> >>
>>> >> The information sent in or enclosed with this email is confidential
>>> and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this email but
>>> are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and
>>> delete the message. Please be advised that the unauthorised use,
>>> disclosure, dissemination or distribution of information is prohibited by
>>> law and may entail liability.
>>> >>
>>> >> The sender cannot be held liable for damage in connection with risks
>>> inherent in electronic message transfer. The sender has taken standard
>>> precautions to verify no computer viruses are present in this email or any
>>> attachments it may contain. However, the presence of malware, such as
>>> viruses, cannot be ruled out.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>> --
>> David Wood
>>
>>
>

-- 
Regards,
Dave
--
David Wood