Re: Request for Review of WebID specs before publishing

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:

>  On 9/6/13 12:32 PM, Andrei Sambra wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:
>
>>  On 9/6/13 11:22 AM, Erich Bremer wrote:
>>
>> "The WebID URI - *"http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i"*
>>
>>
>>  It should really be:
>>
>> <*http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i> (a Reference) as opposed
>> to **"http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card<http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card>
>> #i"* (a Literal) :-)
>>
>
>  I disagree. There we are talking about the URI components, not the RDF
> representation of the URI. For example, it's meant to be used when giving
> someone your WebID, as opposed to the URI of your WebID profile document:
> "Here is my WebID: http://bob.example.org/profile#me. Please add me as
> your friend".
>
> Andrei
>
> <> has nothing to do with RDF.
> <#Andrei> != "Andrei" .
>

Yes, but the context in which we are presenting that URI has nothing to do
with <>. As a matter of fact, we are not discussing semantics in that
particular context. We are just presenting the difference between two
strings of characters.

Andrei



> Kingsley
>
>
>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen 
>> Founder & CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
>> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
>> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen 
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 17:45:11 UTC