W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webfonts-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: WOFF spec comments (was Re: Metadata Questions)

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:52:45 +0100
Message-ID: <3710148511.20101110215245@w3.org>
To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
CC: WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, Vladimir Levantovsky <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 9:40:52 PM, John wrote:

JD> Chris Lilley wrote:

>> I seem to recall discussion that the OT spec required padding
>> between tables but was silent or ambiguous about padding after the
>> last table.

JD> I should point out here that the OT spec doesn't *require*
JD> padding, it merely recommends it.

JD> http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/recom.htm

Thanks for the correction. "It is suggested" is pretty weak, especially followed by a 'should'.



-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:52:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 November 2010 20:52:51 GMT