W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webfonts-wg@w3.org > December 2010

Re: Test Suite in CVS

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:29:19 +0100
Message-ID: <598915517.20101208212919@w3.org>
To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
CC: WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 9:00:18 PM, Tal wrote:


TL> I found this comment:

TL> http://www.princehtml.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2449

>> Okay, for Prince 7.0 we have changed the font name behaviour to use the PostScript name for OpenType CFF fonts. 


TL> The Postscript name in the fallback font is "WOFFTestCFFFallback-Regular".

TL> What is the best way to handle this

The best way is to see what CSS3 Fonts says about family names and do that, asking jdaggett is anything is unclear.

TL> —should I change the CSS to 

TL>         font-family: "WOFF Test", "WOFF Test CFF Fallback", "WOFFTestCFFFallback-Regular";

TL> or should I change the name table in the source fonts?

Can PostScript names have spaces? if they can, do they usually?




-- 
 Chris Lilley   Technical Director, Interaction Domain                 
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
 Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 20:30:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 December 2010 20:30:26 GMT