W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webfonts-wg@w3.org > December 2010

RE: Test Suite in CVS

From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:07:14 -0500
To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7534F85A589E654EB1E44E5CFDC19E3D053BE3A6C6@wob-email-01.agfamonotype.org>
I would suggest to also add TTF font as one of the fallback options for those cases when the underlying system doesn't render CFF.
We may also want to consider using WOFF TTF fonts for these tests.

Vlad


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-webfonts-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webfonts-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tal Leming
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:00 PM
> To: Chris Lilley
> Cc: WOFF Working Group FONT
> Subject: Re: Test Suite in CVS
> 
> 
> On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Chris Lilley wrote:
> 
> > I also ran them through PrinceXML 7.1 and found an odd effect. Its
> doesn't display FAIL and it doesn't display PASS. It displays P
> 
> The word PASS is mapped to U+0050 (P) and FAIL is mapped to U+0046 (F).
> 
> My guess is that it is the font-family name that is being used in the
> CSS. I have this:
> 
> 	font-family: "WOFF Test", "WOFF Test CFF Fallback";
> 
> I found this comment:
> 
> http://www.princehtml.com/bb/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2449
> 
> > Okay, for Prince 7.0 we have changed the font name behaviour to use
> the PostScript name for OpenType CFF fonts.
> 
> 
> The Postscript name in the fallback font is "WOFFTestCFFFallback-
> Regular".
> 
> What is the best way to handle this-should I change the CSS to
> 
> 	font-family: "WOFF Test", "WOFF Test CFF Fallback",
> "WOFFTestCFFFallback-Regular";
> 
> or should I change the name table in the source fonts?
> 
> Tal
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 20:07:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 8 December 2010 20:07:47 GMT