On 3/18/13 8:05 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote: > On 03/18/2013 12:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Touch Events Editors, All, >> >> Below, Boris identifies some bugs with the Touch Events v1 spec's IDL. >> Please review his comments and propose how these issues should be >> addressed. >> >> My proposed resolution to these bugs ... >> >> * Touch.createTouch() - change the AbstractView type to WindowProxy and >> add [HTML5] to the references. >> >> * Touch.target - the definition of Touch.target should replace Element >> with TargetEvent >> > > EventTarget, presumably. Ooops. Yes, thanks. >> * TouchList.item() - clarify the indices are 0 ... length-1 >> >> * TouchList.item() - clarify that it returns null if index is >= >> TouchList.length >> >> * Since TouchList.item returns null if the index is >= length, change >> the signature to: >> >> [[ >> getter Touch? item (unsigned long index); >> ]] > > Looks good otherwise. Can we update the spec now? Since the spec is effectively still under LC review, I'd like to hear from some others (especially Matt, Sangwhan, Rick, Olli). -AB > > Thanks > Ms2ger >Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 12:09:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 March 2013 12:09:22 GMT