W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:08:28 -0400
Message-ID: <514703BC.3020100@nokia.com>
To: ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
CC: Doug Schepers <doug@w3.org>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>, Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, public-webevents@w3.org
On 3/18/13 8:05 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
> On 03/18/2013 12:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Touch Events Editors, All,
>>
>> Below, Boris identifies some bugs with the Touch Events v1 spec's IDL.
>> Please review his comments and propose how these issues should be
>> addressed.
>>
>> My proposed resolution to these bugs ...
>>
>> * Touch.createTouch() - change the AbstractView type to WindowProxy and
>> add [HTML5] to the references.
>>
>> * Touch.target - the definition of Touch.target should replace Element
>> with TargetEvent
>>
>
> EventTarget, presumably.

Ooops. Yes, thanks.

>> * TouchList.item() - clarify the indices are 0 ... length-1
>>
>> * TouchList.item() - clarify that it returns null if index is >=
>> TouchList.length
>>
>> * Since TouchList.item returns null if the index is >= length, change
>> the signature to:
>>
>> [[
>> getter Touch? item (unsigned long index);
>> ]]
>
> Looks good otherwise. Can we update the spec now?

Since the spec is effectively still under LC review, I'd like to hear 
from some others (especially Matt, Sangwhan, Rick, Olli).

-AB

>
> Thanks
> Ms2ger
>
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 12:09:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 March 2013 12:09:22 GMT