W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:49:10 +0100
Message-ID: <51470D46.80605@helsinki.fi>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
CC: Doug Schepers <doug@w3.org>, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com>, Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>, public-webevents@w3.org
On 03/18/2013 01:08 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On 3/18/13 8:05 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
>> On 03/18/2013 12:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> Touch Events Editors, All,
>>>
>>> Below, Boris identifies some bugs with the Touch Events v1 spec's IDL.
>>> Please review his comments and propose how these issues should be
>>> addressed.
>>>
>>> My proposed resolution to these bugs ...
>>>
>>> * Touch.createTouch() - change the AbstractView type to WindowProxy and
>>> add [HTML5] to the references.
>>>
>>> * Touch.target - the definition of Touch.target should replace Element
>>> with TargetEvent
>>>
>>
>> EventTarget, presumably.
>
> Ooops. Yes, thanks.
>
>>> * TouchList.item() - clarify the indices are 0 ... length-1
>>>
>>> * TouchList.item() - clarify that it returns null if index is >=
>>> TouchList.length
>>>
>>> * Since TouchList.item returns null if the index is >= length, change
>>> the signature to:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> getter Touch? item (unsigned long index);
>>> ]]
>>
>> Looks good otherwise. Can we update the spec now?
>
> Since the spec is effectively still under LC review, I'd like to hear from some others (especially Matt, Sangwhan, Rick, Olli).

Proposed changes look good to me.


-Olli

>
> -AB
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ms2ger
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 12:50:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 18 March 2013 12:50:09 GMT