W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: ACTION-57 done

From: Tran, Dzung D <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 03:01:37 +0000
To: Sangwhan Moon <smoon@opera.com>
CC: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Message-ID: <84BCA539DD96614691177EDA3CE4FF0513735A12@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>

These code examples looks fine. Yes, I was thinking the same with examples for the use of Touch objects. I will wait for your email on blocking issues.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sangwhan Moon [mailto:smoon@opera.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:14 AM
To: Tran, Dzung D
Cc: public-webevents@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION-57 done

Dzung, you are welcome to come up with something better - I sure think that there is plenty of room for improvement.

I haven't actually asserted against any of the Touch objects and approached in a bit more primitive approach (lengths) due to other blocking issues - details to follow on a upcoming mail.

On 2011. Aug (8). 03, at 8:07 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> Thanks Sangwhan. I closed action-57 and will leave its issue-18 open for a bit as a reminder that you and/or others are welcome to create patches for additional examples.
> FYI, Dzung Tran mentioned he may be able to contribute an example.
> On 8/3/11 6:21 AM, ext Sangwhan Moon wrote:
>> Sorry for the long delay - I've addressed a proposal for ISSUE-18 and pushed it to the repo.
>> Probably needs some clean-up. (or making more minimal examples, not sure which direction is better)

Best regards,

Sangwhan Moon
Opera Software ASA | Skype: innodb1
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 03:02:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:09:33 UTC