- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:15:41 +0000
- To: public-webcrypto@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25198 --- Comment #7 from Anne <annevk@annevk.nl> --- (In reply to Mark Watson from comment #6) > KeyAlgorithm.name is extensible, though the defined process for registering > new algorithms and (unless I am mis-understanding) making it an enum would > interact badly with that extensibility point. How does the extensibility work? Why can't the specification be revised? > I believe future specifications could also add new methods to SubtleCrypto, > which might come with new algorithms and new KeyUsage values, so I suggest > we leave KeyUsage as a DOMString. New specification could also simply update the enum, I don't see the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2014 15:15:43 UTC