W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Is the "Key" interface name too generic?

From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:37:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CACvaWvbCZyOep8RqqrXgwgMiidMky7CSqfpLQOHTDevTUe1-fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
On May 6, 2014 5:16 AM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On 4/23/14, 10:14 PM, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>>
>> Nope. Hasn't even been discussed really. I'm mostly ambivalent, and am
>> happy to avoid squatting on a desirable/confusing prototype name.
>> WebCryptoKey, KeyHandle, CryptoKey, etc. Whatever colour the shed looks
>> best with.
>
>
> OK.  How do we go about making a decision here?  I've filed
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25577 to track this.
>
> -Boris

I was hoping others might chime in whether they want the bikeshed red or
blue.

Absent that, CryptoKey seems to be popular internally here. Preferences
from you?
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 15:37:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:22 UTC