W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > May 2013

Re: Meeting today: Agenda for Telecon Monday May 6th 20:00 GMT

From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 09:07:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEnTvdDxfjyyASN1xERAhw=0X5=iForsm2gEcRMuw2z204O3Tw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Cc: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

> We'll be meeting today, same time and place as usual:
> +1.617.761.6200, 27978# (CRYPT)
> IRC irc.w3.org:6665 #crypto
> 20h GMT
> I'm filling in for Virginie writing this agenda -  here's my take on high
> priority things to discuss, feel free to amend!
> 1) Futures examples and integration into editors draft - next public
> working draft?
> 2) new use-cases - scheduling folks time with Arun
> 3) Key wrap/unwrap integration as "feature at risk"

The issue Ryan and I have been discussing is whether there is ever any
security significance to the API boundary (between UA and JS). Or, put
another way, whether there is a reasonable use-case for never exposing keys
to the JS (in the absence of pre-provisioned keys).

We've agreed to include key wrap/unwrap as a "feature at risk" (twice). I
don't think we should revisit the inclusion of that in the next editor's

We do need to discuss the boundary topic, as that is a point of significant
disagreement which might affect what we do with wrap, unwrap and other
features in future.


> 3) Next week, optional  high-level API meeting
> 4) Inviting more review - for example,  getting Dan Boneh et al. actually
> write down their critiques on mailing list. Dan Boneh offered to join a
> telecon - shall we aim for the next 2 week?
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 16:08:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:17 UTC